Understand disagreement, without losing the evidence.
Drop in any article. See what's really being said — and what got left out.
Proof over persuasion.
oryn is built for high-stakes reading: it turns disagreement into explicit dispute types, forces evidence cards, and keeps the retrieval trace visible.
Talk naturally while oryn listens, analyzes, and structures your conversation into a live transcript — updating evidence cards in real time.
Every factual assertion is linked to query steps, source selection criteria, and ranking decisions. Nothing is hidden from the audit trail.
The system cannot surface a factual claim until it can attach an evidence card and a citation path. Enforced at the architecture level.
Three moves. One decision.
Start with a claim or URL, review evidence cards with counter-frames, then pick from three next reads selected for coverage.
Drop in a URL, paste a claim, or describe a position you're trying to evaluate.
oryn surfaces evidence cards with counter-frames — grounded claims, not summaries.
Choose from three deliberate next reads, selected for coverage not engagement loops.
Built for reading that matters.
Pick a workflow. The UI stays the same: claims become evidence cards, traces stay inspectable, and you get a deliberate choice set instead of a feed.
Start reading deliberately.
Evidence cards, counter-frames, and a trace you can inspect. No feeds, no summaries — just grounded claims and deliberate next reads.